Click here to sign in with or
Forget Password?
Learn more
share this!
432
67
Share
Email
November 15, 2022
by University of Queensland
Artificial intelligence has revealed that prehistoric footprints thought to be made by a vicious dinosaur predator were in fact from a timid herbivore.
In an international collaboration, University of Queensland paleontologist Dr. Anthony Romilio used AI pattern recognition to re-analyze footprints from the Dinosaur Stampede National Monument, south-west of Winton in Central Queensland.
“Large dinosaur footprints were first discovered back in the 1970s at a track site called the Dinosaur Stampede National Monument, and for many years they were believed to be left by a predatory dinosaur, like Australovenator, with legs nearly two meters long,” said Dr. Romilio.
“The mysterious tracks were thought to be left during the mid-Cretaceous Period, around 93 million years ago.
“But working out what dino species made the footprints exactly—especially from tens of millions of years ago—can be a pretty difficult and confusing business.
“Particularly since these big tracks are surrounded by thousands of tiny dinosaur footprints, leading many to think that this predatory beast could have sparked a stampede of smaller dinosaurs.
“So, to crack the case, we decided to employ an AI program called Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.”
It was trained with 1,500 dinosaur footprints, all of which were theropod or ornithopod in origin—the groups of dinosaurs relevant to the Dinosaur Stampede National Monument prints.
The results were clear: the tracks had been made by a herbivorous ornithopod dinosaur.
Dr. Jens Lallensack, lead author from Liverpool John Moores University in the UK, said that the computer assistance was vital, as the team was originally at an impasse.
“We were pretty stuck, so thank god for modern technology,” Dr. Lallensack said.
“In our research team of three, one person was pro-meat-eater, one person was undecided, and one was pro-plant-eater.
“So—to really check our science—we decided to go to five experts for clarification, plus use AI.
“The AI was the clear winner, outperforming all of the experts by a wide margin, with a margin of error of around 11 percent.
“When we used the AI on the large tracks from the Dinosaur Stampede National Monument, all but one of these tracks was confidently classified as left by an ornithopod dinosaur—our prehistoric ‘predator’.”
The team hopes to continue to add to the fossil dinosaur tracks database and conduct further AI investigations.
The research is published in the Journal of The Royal Society Interface and includes collaborations between Australian, German, and UK researchers.
A replica of the dinosaur trackway is on display at the Queensland Museum, Brisbane, and the track site can be visited near south-west of Winton, Queensland.
More information: Jens N. Lallensack et al, A machine learning approach for the discrimination of theropod and ornithischian dinosaur tracks, Journal of The Royal Society Interface (2022). DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0588
Journal information: Journal of the Royal Society Interface
Provided by University of Queensland
More information: Jens N. Lallensack et al, A machine learning approach for the discrimination of theropod and ornithischian dinosaur tracks, Journal of The Royal Society Interface (2022). DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0588
Journal information: Journal of the Royal Society Interface
Journal information: Journal of the Royal Society Interface
Provided by University of Queensland
Explore further
Facebook
Twitter
Email
Feedback to editors
7 hours ago
0
7 hours ago
0
Dec 12, 2022
2
Dec 12, 2022
0
Dec 12, 2022
0
10 minutes ago
30 minutes ago
56 minutes ago
1 hour ago
1 hour ago
1 hour ago
2 hours ago
2 hours ago
4 hours ago
4 hours ago
Apr 24, 2020
Oct 21, 2021
Nov 16, 2018
Feb 14, 2019
Feb 17, 2020
Apr 16, 2021
11 hours ago
23 hours ago
Dec 12, 2022
Dec 12, 2022
Dec 12, 2022
Dec 12, 2022
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient’s address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.
Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we’ll never share your details to third parties.
More information Privacy policy
Medical research advances and health news
The latest engineering, electronics and technology advances
The most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web
This site uses cookies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our services, collect data for ads personalisation and provide content from third parties. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.